PORT-AU-PRINCE.— The conclusion of a series of training sessions organized by the Ministry of Justice and Public Security (MJSP) under the high patronage of the Presidency marks a new stage in the official strategy aimed at professionalizing political parties. More than a hundred representatives, from parties already regularized with the ministry, took part in these workshops, which aim to modernize the Haitian political landscape.
But behind this institutional effort, several structural issues persist, questioning the real depth of this approach.
The choice of Creole for inclusive participation: a symbolic but strategic signal
The choice to organize sessions exclusively in Creole is not insignificant. In a country where language has often served as a barrier to access public life, this linguistic anchoring reflects a desire for inclusivity, at least in form. Led by the Center for the Promotion of Democracy and Participatory Education, the two previous days, November 22 and 23, aimed to simplify the transmission of tools, modernize internal practices, and strengthen communication skills.
These training sessions are part of a national tour that has already reached the Grand Sud and the North, mobilizing hundreds of political party members. The MJSP thus seeks to build a progressive dynamic of institutional strengthening, in a context where partisan structures remain mostly weak, fragmented, or even dormant.
The regularization of parties: necessary filter or exclusion mechanism?
The criterion imposed by the MJSP: being a regularized party to participate in the sessions, illustrates a stated desire for seriousness and transparency. However, in a political system where regularization depends as much on administrative capacity as on power dynamics, this filter could also function as a barrier.
It reinforces a paradox: the State seeks to professionalize parties... but only those that have already reached a certain level of organization. Perhaps a good way to stop the proliferation of political parties in the country, without trampling on citizen rights.
The approach nevertheless remains consistent with the desire to clean up the political space and establish minimal standards for those who aspire to play an institutional role.
A favorable reception with a notable absence: the gender dimension
While the initiative has generally received positive appreciation, it has also revealed a major omission: the issue of gender.
The representative of the Democratic Mobilization for the Recovery of Haiti (MDRH) party, Leger Mc Guffy, highlighted this by expressing a critical position on the 30% quota for women's representation, which she accuses of « diminishing » women rather than promoting them.
This intervention highlights a fundamental dilemma: how to build political modernization that does not immediately integrate one of the most discussed issues in contemporary democracies—the equitable participation of women?
The absence of the theme in the modules is striking, as it reveals the ideological limits of the training: modernizing the technical framework of parties, yes; questioning internal power relations, much less so.
A lever for modernization... in a political landscape struggling to restructure itself
For the organizers, this training represents an essential tool to correct the structural flaws of parties: fragmentation, absence of trained personnel, improvised leadership, lack of internal strategy. In theory, the objective is clear: to professionalize political life and prepare parties to play a stabilizing role in a country shaken by insecurity, citizen mistrust, and the prolonged absence of elections.
But institutional modernization cannot be limited to the transmission of technical modules. It must be part of a global vision:
– of redefinition of the role of parties in governance;
– of strengthening public accountability;
– of building political leadership aligned with social needs and not only with electoral deadlines.
This training, a step forward, but the road remains long
This series of training sessions undeniably marks progress in the attempt to modernize Haitian political life. It introduces tools, creates a space for reflection, and, even modestly, opens the way to better professionalization of partisan actors.
But true modernization requires more: sustained political will, a rethinking of internal practices, the integration of structuring themes such as gender, ethics, or governance, and above all, an effective commitment to restoring citizen trust.
In short, it illustrates a necessary, but still insufficient, effort to transform a political landscape that remains profoundly fragile.
Jean Mapou