PORT-AU-PRINCE.— The fragile process aimed at establishing inclusive political dialogue in Haiti has just suffered another setback. The Bishop of Nippes, Mgr Pierre-André Dumas, announced his withdrawal from any participation in a national mediation initiative, citing a concern for clarity, coherence, and fidelity to his pastoral mission.
In a public statement, the prelate affirmed that his involvement was never intended to propose or develop a political solution to the multidimensional crisis facing the country. He stated that he responded to requests within a strictly pastoral framework, seeking to restore dialogue where it had broken down within a fragmented political landscape deeply undermined by mistrust.
A Withdrawal Amid Criticism
Mgr Dumas's decision comes as challenges from various sectors multiplied regarding his role. The National Network for the Defense of Human Rights (RNDDH), as well as prominent political figures, including former Prime Minister Jean-Henry Céant, had publicly questioned his designation, citing a lack of consensus and suspicions of partiality.
In response to these criticisms, the Bishop of Nippes wishes to correct certain perceptions. He asserts that he never put himself forward for the role of national mediator, clarifying that his name had been associated with this initiative following calls from political coalitions, civil society organizations, major constituted bodies, as well as national and international figures. He states that he accepted these requests in communion with the Church, without claiming to act on behalf of the Episcopal Conference of Haiti.
A Reaffirmed Pastoral Mission
While rejecting any political affiliation, Mgr Dumas reiterates that his vocation remains that of a pastor. Listening to all voices, dialoguing with everyone, and encouraging any sincere initiative oriented towards the common good, he emphasizes, believing that in any mediation process, «the role of a mediator is to open doors; the responsibility to cross them belongs to the daughters and sons of Haiti».
The prelate also states that he is acting to dispel confusion fueled by information he deems inaccurate, erroneous interpretations, and attempts at political opportunism. After discernment and prayer, he ultimately decided to withdraw from any direct and operational involvement in this mediation.
This withdrawal, he insists, should not be interpreted as a lack of interest in the national situation. It is, according to him, an act of responsibility and coherence with his pastoral mission.
The episode once again illustrates the complexity of the Haitian political crisis and the recurring difficulties in establishing dialogue mechanisms capable of uniting all forces present. In this context of widespread institutional, societal, and political mistrust, the search for consensus remains a major challenge.
Jean Mapou / Le Relief